Sheboygan Common Council Ends Contract With Flock Safety Over Privacy Concerns
The Sheboygan Common Council has unanimously voted to end its contract with Flock Safety, a company that provided license-plate-reading cameras. The decision comes amid growing concerns over privacy related to data sharing proposals from the company.
Milwaukee, WI, September 8, 2026 —
The Sheboygan Common Council has taken a decisive step to terminate its contract with Flock Safety, a company known for providing license-plate-reading camera technology. The council’s decision was unanimous, signaling a strong consensus among its members regarding the future of the city’s surveillance equipment and data handling practices.
The agreement’s termination stems from developing concerns specifically related to privacy. Reports indicate that the core of the issue lies in data sharing proposals put forth by Flock Safety. While the specifics of these proposals were not detailed in the provided information, they were significant enough to prompt the council’s unanimous vote to end the contractual relationship.
Flock Safety’s technology involves the deployment of automated license plate readers (ALPRs), which capture images of license plates and store them. This data is often used by law enforcement for investigative purposes. However, questions surrounding how this data is stored, accessed, shared, and retained have become increasingly prominent in public discourse and among legislative bodies across the nation.
The trend summary does not specify the exact date of the Common Council’s vote, nor does it provide details about the duration or financial terms of the original contract with Flock Safety. Information regarding the contractor’s name, beyond the company name Flock Safety, is not available. The timeline for the contract’s termination and what happens next with the existing camera hardware are also not stated in the available information.
Similarly, the trend summary does not mention any specific privacy incidents, violations, or the exact nature of the data sharing proposals that triggered the council’s concern. The amount of any potential fines, the status of permits, or the outcomes of specific inspections related to the Flock Safety system were not provided. The names of individuals on the council who may have led the discussion or voted against the measure were not included in the summary.
The decision by the Sheboygan Common Council reflects a broader societal debate concerning the balance between public safety initiatives enabled by surveillance technology and the fundamental right to privacy. As municipalities increasingly adopt advanced technologies, scrutiny over data privacy practices is expected to intensify, potentially leading to similar reviews and contract adjustments in other jurisdictions.
Story summarized from the original created by John Kim on www.tmj4.com, see more information here.
Media gallery
